Sample report · anonymised
A real audit, with the client's name removed.
Every section below appears in the report you receive. Figures and citations are from an actual engagement; company and competitor names have been replaced.
Composite visibility, 0–100.
Company A is named in 11 of 80 answers and rarely recommended in any of them. It is described accurately when it does appear, which is the good news: the deficit is coverage, not reputation.
Insight
Score is held down by three signals — mention rate, competitive share and citation breadth. All three respond to third-party placement, which is why the plan in Section 05 leads there rather than on-site work.
Eight signals, each traced to evidence.
Who gets named in your place.
Company A
11
12%
2.8
Integration questions only
Priority
Competitor 1 holds 34% of vendor mentions off the strength of two comparison pages and a review-site category page. Both accept vendor submissions. That is the single highest-leverage move in this audit.
Four domains produced 78% of every answer.
Three tiers, ordered by lift per hour of effort.
Lift figures are modelled from comparable engagements, not promises. We do not control the models, and we say so in the report rather than in a footnote.